Continental Adjustment Corp. v. Melko
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtCase, J.
The prosecutor sued the respondent Klause in the District Court of the city of Perth Amboy and filed its -complaint to which the defendant therein filed her specification of defenses and a counter-claim. The matter seems to have been disposed of by the judge of the District Court sitting .without a jury and on an agreed state of facts.
Prosecutor alleges that a judgment was entered in its favor and against the defendant on June 18th, 1934, and that more than thirty days thereafter,, namely, on August 31st, 1934, the District Court judge, without notice to the prosecutor, reversed that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ashendorf v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Smith v. WendkosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934