Legal Opinion

State, Department of Agriculture v. Hinote

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 1983No. AS-226Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Judge.

The Department of Agriculture, employer of this injured claimant, urges that the deputy erred in holding the claim not barred by the two-year statute of limitations, section 440.19(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). The issue arises on an order for the payment of medical benefits alone, on account of surgery and other services required for treatment of claimant’s detached retina. Claimant, a livestock specialist engaged in brucellosis testing, sustained this eye injury in June 1980 when he was trampled and knocked unconscious.

According to the deputy’s finding, which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. Sea Isle HotelSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Delap v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Evans v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  5. Carraway v. Armour and CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API