Wilkerson v. State

Appellant was convicted of burglary. He urges us to réverse and remand the case because (1) error was made by the trial court in the method of selecting and empanel ing the jury which convicted him, (2) the verdict of guilty is against the great weight of the evidence, and (3) the property taken during the course of the burglary was not identified.

On the first question, court started on Monday morning, March 21, 1949. Sixty-two persons, whose names had been duly drawn from the jury box, reported for jury duty. That number had been exhausted in empaneling the grand and two petit juries. The…