Legal Opinion

Berringer v. Schaefer

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

— The rule which governs cases of this character is well stated by judge Brown in delivering the opinion of the court of appeals in the case of Nevius agt. Dunlap (33 N. Y., 680). He says: “ To entitle a party to a decree of a court of equity reforming a written instrument, he must show, first, a plain mistake, clearly made out by satisfactory proofs. Whenever .the evidence is loose, equivocal or contradictory, or is in its texture open to doubt or opposing presumptions, the relief will not be granted (citing Story's Equity J., 157). This presumption is obvious, *70because the written…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Barrow v. RichardNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  3. Gibert v. . PetelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Plumb v. . TubbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Brouwer v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curtis v. GilesThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API