Legal Opinion · Concurrence

County of Contra Costa v. American Toll Bridge Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1937No. S. F. 15342Published

1Concurrence

EDMONDS, J., Concurring.

I concur in the judgment upon the ground that the toll bridge company, having accepted the benefits of the franchise granted by the ordinance of Contra Costa County and still continuing to do so, is estopped from challenging its provisions. The company cannot claim both under and against the enactment by which the franchise was created and now exists. It is a contract between the corporation and the county. “One cannot in the same proceeding both assail a statute and rely upon it,” (Hurley v. Commissioner of Fisheries, 257 U. S. 223 [42 Sup. C.t. 83, 66 L. Ed. 206 ]);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hurley v. Commission of Fisheries of Va.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Crittenden County v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API