Legal Opinion

Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. v. Rogers

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 7, 2024No. 2:24-cv-03319Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 2:24-cv-03319-DCN vs. ) ) ORDER TRAVIS ROGERS, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________) This matter is before the court on plaintiff Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.’s (“Nutrien”) motion to strike and for leave to file sur-reply, ECF No. 44. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies Nutrien’s motion to strike and grants its motion for leave to file a sur-reply. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Thomas Rogers (“Rogers”) was once employed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. Southeast Anesthesia Associates, P.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1995
  2. Abrasives-South, Inc. v. AWUKO Abrasives Wandmacher GmbH & Co. KGDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API