New York Life Insurance v. Watters
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.
Separate suits were instituted by appellee against appellants in the Pulaski Circuit Court upon life insurance policies issued by each to her husband, in which she was named as the beneficiary. The defense interposed to each suit was that the insured committed suicide, which was an excepted risk. The causes were consolidated by agreement and submitted to a jury upon the pleadings, evidence, and instructions, which resulted in a verdict and separate judgments against each appellant in favor of appellee, from which is this appeal.
At the conclusion of the testimony appellants requested the court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. BanisterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nichols v. New York Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Webster v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Curth v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Von Crome v. Travelers' Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.