Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1975No. 48509PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

The original appeal in this case was dismissed because the sentence was prematurely pronounced. It now appears that the sentence has been properly pronounced and notice of appeal given. The appeal is reinstated.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of assault with intent to murder with malice and they assessed his punishment at ten (10) years.

The appellant made an application for probation, wherein he swore he had never been convicted of a felony. A requested charge on probation was refused by the court.

The sole ground of error is that the court erred in its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heine v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  2. Ex Parte WelchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Milburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Bannach v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  5. Bannach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API