Franklin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
The original appeal in this case was dismissed because the sentence was prematurely pronounced. It now appears that the sentence has been properly pronounced and notice of appeal given. The appeal is reinstated.
Appellant was convicted by a jury for the offense of assault with intent to murder with malice and they assessed his punishment at ten (10) years.
The appellant made an application for probation, wherein he swore he had never been convicted of a felony. A requested charge on probation was refused by the court.
The sole ground of error is that the court erred in its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- Heine v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Ex Parte WelchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Milburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Bannach v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Bannach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.