Lackey v. Mize
Supreme Court of Georgia
Evidence. Claims. Forthcoming Bond. Before B. B. Hinton, Esq., Judge pro Jiao vice. Sumter Superior Court. April Adjourned Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Chief Justice.
This is a suit on a forthcoming bond given by the claimant, W. L. Lackey, as agent for his wife and children, for the delivery of a mare and buggy, should the property be found subject. It was found subject, and the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and Lackey and Toole, his surety, excepted to the denial of a new trial.
1. Among other grounds for the new trial taken by the plaintiffs in error is the refusal of the court to admit as evidence before the jury, another claim to the buggy and mare made by Mrs. Lackey in her own right, with the usual bonds accompanying…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barrett v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Giddens v. DismukesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dixon v. Cassels Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Williams v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Brown Guano Co. v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Peacock Hardware Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Earnest v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.