Deeb v. Ferris
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Baldbige, J.,
Opinion by
The plaintiff and defendants are adjoining property owners. Plaintiff filed a bill in equity to compel defendants to reconnect a sewer pipe which defendants had severed and to recover damages. The case was before us on a previous appeal where the facts are fully set forth. See Deeb v. Ferris et al., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 489, 193 A. 75. We reversed the court below in granting plaintiff relief prayed for including an award of $500 for liquidated damages, remitted the record “fop a definite finding not only whether there was an open, notorious, and continuous use of this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garrett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Pierce v. CloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Deeb v. FerrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Laura Fister v. Thomas ReitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elias v. Scott Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Cohn v. Williams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bedford County1947
- Duhring Resource Co v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Duhring Resource Co v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019