Legal Opinion

Deeb v. Ferris

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1942No. Appeal, 172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldbige, J.,

Opinion by

The plaintiff and defendants are adjoining property owners. Plaintiff filed a bill in equity to compel defendants to reconnect a sewer pipe which defendants had severed and to recover damages. The case was before us on a previous appeal where the facts are fully set forth. See Deeb v. Ferris et al., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 489, 193 A. 75. We reversed the court below in granting plaintiff relief prayed for including an award of $500 for liquidated damages, remitted the record “fop a definite finding not only whether there was an open, notorious, and continuous use of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garrett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  2. Pierce v. CloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Deeb v. FerrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Laura Fister v. Thomas ReitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elias v. Scott Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Cohn v. Williams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bedford County1947
  3. Duhring Resource Co v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. Duhring Resource Co v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API