Legal Opinion

Bloomquist v. County of Isanti

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1922No. 22,919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action by taxpayers of Isanti county to restrain the county board and others from performing certain contracts for the publication of *127official proceedings required, to be made in a newspaper of tbe county. Tbe trial court granted a temporary injunction. Certain of the defendants appeal.

By C. S. 1918, § 1091, it is provided that “no contract for work or labor, or for the purchase of furniture, fixtures, or other property, or for the construction or repair of roads,” etc., where the estimated cost or value exceeds $500, shall be made without first advertising for bids. There was no call for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dewell v. Board of Com'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnard v. County of KandiyohiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Cain v. County of WabashaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. George M. Jensen Printing Co. v. SnivelySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Reese v. Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API