Alford v. Eubank
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Probate Court of Montgomery. Tried before Hon. David Campbell. The opinion contains the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtB. E. Saeeold, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of the probate court, rendered on the final settlement of an administrator’s accounts, and must be tried on a bill of exceptions, unless the error complained of appears upon the record. — Rev. Code, §§ 2247, 2250; Bartee and Wife v. James, 33 Ala. 34.
The errors alleged are certain credits allowed to the administrator, but the objections to them are founded on facts stated in a writing purporting to be a bill of exceptions, but no where else apparent on the record. This professed bill of exceptions is not signed by the judge, nor dated.
The law is imperative,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haden v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Union India Rubber Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Bartee v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pearce v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Ex parte MayfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- National Savings and Trust Company v. HerrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958