Legal Opinion

KIMTA AS v. Royal Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 18, 2000No. 44282-1-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

9 P.3d 239 (2000)

KIMTA AS, a Norwegian corporation; Emerald Resources Management, Inc., a Washington corporation; Seacatcher Fisheries, Inc., a Washington corporation; New Pollock Limited Partnership, a partnership consisting of: All Alaska Seafoods — Pollock L.L.C. (General Partner), Ervik Holding AS (Limited Partner) and Gier Ole Saetremyr (Limited Partner); Ervik Seafood AS, a Norwegian corporation; Emerald Seafoods, Inc., a Washington corporation; Seahawk Pacific Seafood, Inc., a Washington corporation, Respondents,

v.

ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a non-Washington corporation; John Deere…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Albany Insurance Company v. Anh Thi KieuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coast to Coast Seafood, Inc. v. Assurances Generales de FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. IUI v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API