Legal Opinion

Clement, Bane & Co. v. Oceana Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus by Clement, Bane & Company to compel Fred J. Russell, circuit judge of Oceana county, to vacate an order dismissing a proceeding instituted under chapter 278, 2 How. Stat.

1Per curiam

In a foreclosure suit in chancery, under

chapter 247, 2 How. Stat., the relator, a corporation, obtained a decree against the mortgagors for the deficiency. Execution was issued and returned nulla bona. It then commenced proceedings under chapter 278, 2 How. Stat., entitled “Proceedings at Law in the Nature of a Judgment Creditor’s Bill.” The respondent held that this chapter applied only to judgments at law, and not to decrees in chancery. We think the court in error. In 5 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 489, it is stated that “it has been uniformly determined that such [ money ] decrees may be made the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kraft v. StottMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API