Douglass v. McFarland
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Fitzgerald, C.
This action is brought by plaintiff against the defendant McFarland as constable, and the defendants Markle and Cameron as sureties on his official bond, to recover the possession of certain lots of redwood railroad ties and redwood shakes alleged to have been wrongfully and unlawfully seized and taken from .his possession by said McFarland, as constable, under and by virtue of certain writs of attachment and execution theretofore issued against the property of one Matt Harney, and by said McFarland wrongfully detained from the possession of plaintiff, or for the sum *657of $689,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Quist v. SandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Doot v. Skirving Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Maulhardt v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- International Airports, Inc. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- American Type Founders Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.