Legal Opinion

Donnelly v. Spitza

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 136, Calendar No. 33,734PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is an action to restrain erection of an “income bungalow” on a lot restricted to “only single dwelling houses, duplex or' double houses,” costing not less than $6,500. The restrictions were imposed in October, 1919, defendant Spitza purchased in November, 1919, and began construction in 1927. The term “income bungalow” was not known in Detroit when these restrictions were written. It became current some four to six years ago. It signifies generally a story-and-a-half house of bungalow type, and was developed to aid the owner financially in enabling him to occupy the lower story and to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Borowski v. WelchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Evergreen Village Civic Ass'n v. Oakborn, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kustarz v. JanesickMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Loving v. ClemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Matthew T Thiel v. David L GoyingsMichigan Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API