Legal Opinion
Simpson v. University of Colorado Boulder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2007No. 06-1184, 07-1182PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Lisa Simpson and Anne Gilmore (Plaintiffs) claim that they were sexually assaulted on the night of December 7, 2001, by football players and recruits of the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU). They brought this action against CU under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. See 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1688. The district court granted summary judgment for CU, see Simpson v. Univ. of Colo., 372 F.Supp.2d 1229, 1246 (D.Colo.2005), and later denied motions to alter or amend the judgment and to reopen discovery. Plaintiffs appealed these rulings in our case number 06-1184.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Lewis v. TrippCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- James Hill v. Madison County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Sofie Karasek v. University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- C.T. v. Liberal School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.