Legal Opinion
Mote v. Oryx Energy Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided July 20, 1995No. 1:94-cv-00594PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
SCHELL, Chief Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed February 15,1995. Defendant Webster alleges no personal jurisdiction exists over him. A response by plaintiff Henry Mote was timely filed pursuant to an extension order on April 25, 1995.
The motion was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate, dated July 3, 1980, for findings…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Carolina Ex Rel. Patrick v. BlockDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Oryx Energy Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- LLOG Exploration Company, L.L.C. v. Federal Flange, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019