Legal Opinion

Kilpatrick v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1973No. SC 544PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

Writ denied. By denying the writ, we point out that writs of certiorari are frequently denied without any consideration of the merits. Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc., 273 Ala. 129, 135 So.2d 388 (1961). A denial of certiorari should never be considered as an expression by the reviewing court on the merits of the controversy. See Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L. Ed. 629 (1916). Our denial of the writ should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained in the opinion of the Court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. O. L. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Kilpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CoferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Ex Parte DrinkardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte GentrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API