Legal Opinion
Hoenstein v. Negev Airbase Constructors
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 29, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In this action under a written employment agreement, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint based on documentary evidence and for failure to state a cause of action. Special Term granted the motion. We conclude that Special Term was correct in its determination.
Plaintiff, an accountant, and defendant, a joint venture involved in the construction of an air base in Israel, entered into a written employment agreement which required plaintiff to submit a notice of claim to defendant within 30 days of acquiring knowledge of facts which would entitle him to a claim for money. Plaintiff did not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Murrary v. . Cunard Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Gooch v. Oregon Short Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Gould v. Community Health Plan of Suffolk, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rocha v. Bakhter Afghan Halal Kababs, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Gallegos v. Brandeis SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Escoto v. Leonard Meiselman, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001