Hallmark v. Stillings
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
This is an action in replevin tried to the court under the provisions of Chapter 533, RSMo 1978 and Civil Rule 99. 1 Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appealed. Because the judgment rendered was not in the form contemplated by Rules 99.12 and 99.-13, this court reversed and remanded the cause for entry of a new judgment without addressing the merits of the appeal. Hallmark v. Stillings, 620 S.W.2d 436 (Mo.App. 1981). Upon remand, the trial court entered a new judgment; defendant again appealed. The appeal is thus before the court for a second time but there is no “second…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conduitt v. Trentonton Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Labrier v. Anheuser Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Lampert v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Ellegood v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- Wilhoit v. WilhoitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Renaissance Leasing, LLC v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Tylene J. Coonts, Larry Coonts, and Robert M. Sweere v. John Potts, Sr., Gary Koop, Vernon Johnson, Trampus Taylor, and Hobie JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Asher v. Broadway-Valentine Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Benson v. Jim Maddox Northwest Imports, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. CrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.