In the Interest of J.E.P.

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant C.M.P. (Father) appeals from the trial court’s order modifying the terms and conditions of Appellee C.P.’s (Mother) possession of and access to their two minor children. Because we hold that the modifications do not amount to a de facto change of conservatorship, and because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the modifications, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mother and Father were divorced in 1995. Under the divorce decree, the court appointed Father the sole managing conservator of the children, and…