Legal Opinion

Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Cumberland County Board

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided March 17, 1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

Quinn, President.

As of the assessing dates for the years 1938 and 1939, petitioner was engaged in the business of a banking corporation under the laws of this state, having its principal place of business in the Borough of Vineland, Cumberland County. Its shares of capital stock were thus assessable at their true value, against the shareholders, at the uniform rate of three-quarters of one per cent, upon' such value, under R. S. 54:9-1 et seq.; N. J. S. A. 54:9-1 et seq. Section 54:9-4 provided, so far as is here material, that the value of each share of common bank stock of each bank shall…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Home Savings Bank v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Tradesmens National Bank of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Commercial Trust Co. v. Hudson County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Commercial Trust Co. v. Hudson County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API