Legal Opinion

Ruffino v. United States

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 8, 2019No. 2:16-cv-02719-KJM-CKDPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimberly J. Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

*966Defendant, the United States, moves to dismiss plaintiff Gianfranco Ruffino's negligence claim. ECF No. 27. Defendant contends this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction based on the discretionary function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). For the reasons set forth below, the court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss in part and GRANTS it in part.

I. BACKGROUND

In November 2015, the United States Forest Service (USFS) was overseeing the execution of the 2015 El Dorado County Pile Burn Prescribed Fire Plan (the "Burn Plan"),…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Acker Gumusyazici v. Coeur d' Alene TribeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025
  2. Atwater v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Lobisch v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API