Legal Opinion

Albert Lutterodt v. David J. Potter and Jackson M. Potter

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 24, 2021No. 05-19-00903-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 24, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00903-CV ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant V. DAVID J. POTTER AND JACKSON M. POTTER, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01182-D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell Albert Lutterodt appeals from the county court’s order of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has been pro se throughout this litigation. We liberally construe pro se pleadings and briefs. See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. Pinney, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  2. Richard M. Ross v. National Center for the Employment of the Disabled, as Successor in Interest to Access Healthsource, Inc., Assignee of O.R. BrookerTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Washington v. Bank of New York, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API