Vaughn v. Hixon
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Meade District Court. Replevin by Vaughn against Hixon, as sheriff, and others. At the September term, 1889, defendants had judgment, and plaintiff brings error. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action of replevin, brought by T. A. Vaughn, claiming to be the owner of certain goods, wares, and merchandise,, of the alleged value of $1,000, located in Fargo Springs, in this state. The property had previously been attached in an action instituted by Smith, Heddens & Co., against Mills Bros.; and, while the property was in the possession of the sheriff, the goods were replevied. The action was originally brought in Seward county, but was afterward taken on change of venue to Haskell county, and subsequently, by agreement…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Waterson v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hipple v. HippleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PrestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- City of Garden City v. HellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Automatic Paper Machinery Co. v. Marcalus Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Krehbiel v. GoeringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.