Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Golden Gate Corporation

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1967No. 52568PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURANCE M. HYDE, Special Commissioner.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged violations of its “Minimum Housing Standards Law,” Ordinance 51637; and it sought to obtain compliance by appointment of a receiver, an injunction against further violations and a mandatory injunction under authority of the provisions of Ordinance 53995. The court dismissed the petition with prejudice on constitutional and other grounds raised by defendants; and plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as the City, has appealed.

The City says it acts under Art. I, Sec. 1, subsec. 29, of its charter, giving authority: “To regulate…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. McDonnell Aircraft Corporation v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Carter Carburetor Corp. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Kalbfell v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. In re the Department of BuildingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. City of Kansas City v. New York-Kansas Building Associates L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. O'Neal v. Southwest Missouri Bank of Carthage (In Re Broadview Lumber Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
  4. City of Independence v. DeWittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Titchenal v. DexterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API