Legal Opinion

Disbarment v. Catron

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1895No. 637PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceeding for disbarment of Thomas B. Catron and Charles A. Spiess. Bantz, J., concurring, Collier, J., in the result, and Laughlin, J., dissenting, in separate opinions filed.

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

This is a proceeding upon charges and specifications for the disbarment of Thomas B. Catron and Charles A. Spiess, who are members of the bar of this court. The testimony has all been taken on each side, and the matter is now submitted to the court for a determination. The.ability and high professional standing of at least one of the respondents, the vast importance of this proceeding in its-results, both to them and to the bench and bar of the territory, the great public interest manifested by this investigation, and the anxiety felt in its final determination, have rendered it proper that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Matter of GoldmanMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Matter of GoldmanMontana Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API