Legal Opinion

Golcar S. S. Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 24, 1906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit to recover charter hire.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought by the Golear Steamship Company, Limited, to recover from. The Tweedie Trading Company, certain hire said to be due for the services of the steamship Cape Corrientes, under charter dated July 24-, 1903. The amount of hire claimed, after allowing for certain offsets, was $1449.10 and there was a further claim of $267.30 alleged to be due because of a deficiency of coal on board the steamship when re-delivered on the 8th of October, 1903. The answer denied that there was anything due, but it was subsequently stipulated that the libellant was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Schooner Freeman, &C. v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. The BarnstableSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. The IrrawaddySupreme Court of the United States · 1898

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clyde Commercial Steamships, Ltd. v. United States Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1907
  2. Oxford Paper Co. v. the NidarholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. British Maritime Trust, Ltd. v. Munson S. S. LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  4. Hills v. LeedsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1907
  5. Pacific Improvement Co. v. Schubach-Hamilton S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API