Legal Opinion

Celenski v. Celenski

New York County Courts

Decided April 5, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtArchibald C. Wemple, J.

On the trial the plaintiff testified that the bond and mortgage for $1,000 was secured for money advanced to the defendants to purchase a home. The plaintiff testified that there were no pavments on the bond and mortgage other than a payment of $40 made by the defendant Walter Celenski, on September 19, 1957, which payment was applied to “ interest on the house mortgage.” By reason of this interest payment by one of the defendants, the plaintiff contends that the Statute of Limitations did not apply and that the debt was revived as to both defendants, Walter Celenski and Helen T. Celenski.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMullen v. . RaffertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Hoover v. . HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Keese v. DeweyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  4. Ricci v. PerrinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API