City of Cincinnati v. Ziegler
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Heard on motion of William Ziegler for a new trial and the motions of Fred Schmutte to dismiss the proceedings and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGeoghegan, J.
The motion of the defendant Ziegler for a new trial is based principally upon an alleged error of the court in refusing to give a special instruction to the jury to the effect that the jury might consider the fact that the property of the defendant Ziegler abutted upon other property that had been • acquired by the city of Cincinnati through its park commissioners for a boulevard, and the refusal of the court to admit testimony as to its alleged enhanced value by reason of that fact.
*170This proceeding was one to appropriate property for park purposes. The property sought to be appropriated is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- City of Coldwater v. TuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Matter of Lands in the Town of FlatbushNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Benton v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.