Day-Gormley Leather Co. v. National City Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAPPEY, District Judge.
I regret that there has not been earlier opportunity to take up this ease since the briefs were submitted in May. Even now lack of time prevents me from treating the matter thoroughly or commenting extensively on the authorities.
At the oral argument in April the plaintiff withdrew its objection to the thirteenth defense and the defendant withdrew the fifth, the sixth, and the seventh defenses. We are concerned, therefore, merely with the sufficiency of the first to the fourth, the eighth, the ninth, the eleventh, and the twelfth defenses. In the view I take, as well…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Graffis v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Collins v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Collins v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- Hoyt v. Liberty Mutual Group IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- Hoyt v. Liberty Mutual Group IncDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021