Legal Opinion

Elevator Supplies Co. v. Boedtcher

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 14, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BODINE, District Judge.

The Elevator Supplies Company, Incorporated, is the exclusive licensee for the Herzog patent, 1,022,089, and the owner of the Ne-well patent, 1,160,315, and the Andren patent, 1,109,950. It was conceded at the trial that the plaintiff had sufficient title to maintain a suit. The defenses are noninfringement, invalidity, and some equitable defenses arising from the length of time the Herzog patent was leisurely allowed to rest in the Patent Office while the plaintiff was having the benefit of an exclusive license under the latter Armstrong patent for an elevator…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Herzog v. New York Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  4. Elevator Supply & Repair Co. v. New & Beaver Arcade Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petersen v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  2. Rodriguez Soto v. KijakaziDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API