Legal Opinion

State v. Farrar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 2012No. 08CR1337FE; A143404PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Following a stipulated facts trial, defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence discovered during a traffic stop in which she consented to the search of her car and her purse. She contends that the arresting officer unlawfully extended the traffic stop and that her consent was the unattenuated product of that unlawful conduct. The state responds that the extension of the traffic stop was lawful because the arresting officer had reasonable suspicion that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. MiglavsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. EhretCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. ParnellKlamath County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API