Legal Opinion

Bruckman v. Bruckman Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1938No. 5501PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, PJ.

The cause here considered is a proceeding from a declaratory judgment.

A demurrer was filed to the ■ amended petition and the same was dismissed, as not stating any cause of action.

An examination of the record causes us to conclude that facts were alleged in the amended petition sufficient to state a cause of action under the statutes providing for a declaratory judgment.

This does not mean that the plaintiff has stated facts entitling him to a declaration of rights as he claims them to be, but it means that the court is required to state what rights, if any, the plaintiff…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Anderson v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API