People v. 3474 FAIRVIEW
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentM. F. Cavanagh, P. J.
I must dissent from the majority’s conclusion that MCLA 726.11; MSA 27.3561, does not allow recorder’s court to exercise jurisdiction in the instant case.
My colleagues first accept People v Ewald, 302 Mich 31; 4 NW2d 456 (1942), as authority for the proposition that the exclusive jurisdiction of recorder’s court does not extend to the issuance of a search warrant, a proceeding for the discovery of *485crime. There is support for this interpretation, if the statements in Ewald, supra, are read without reference to the particular circumstances of that case. As I stated, obviously unpersuasively, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Patterson v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- People v. RosaMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. EwaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.