PULSE ENGINEERING, INC. v. Travelers Indemnity Company
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CHOICE OF LAW
LARRY J. McKINNEY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are several Motions for Summary Judgment on the issue of choice of law. Dkt. Nos. 86, 87, 201, 204, 207. For the following reasons, the Court determines that Indiana law applies to this case.
I. BACKGROUND
A. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In this action, Pulse Engineering, Inc. (“Pulse”) seeks a declaration of the scope of its rights under several insurance contracts with respect to certain defense and environmental response costs. Dkt. No. 278 at ¶ 1. This lawsuit began in 2004, when Pulse sued Federal Insurance Company…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pisciotta v. Old National BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Hampton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- MacLin v. SBC AMERITECHCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. v. Standard Fusee Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010