Legal Opinion
HARISH v. ARBIT
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 31, 2025No. 2:21-cv-11088Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : ZIV HARISH, : Civil Action No. 21-11088-EP-AME : Plaintiff, : v. : OPINION and ORDER : EHUD ARBIT, et al., : : Defendants. : : ESPINOSA, U.S.M.J. This matter is before the Court on the motion by Plaintiff Ziv Harish (“Plaintiff”) to disqualify counsel for Defendants Dr. Ehud Arbit (“Arbit”) and Isaac Rubinstein (“Rubinstein”) (together, “Defendants”): Marc Cooperman, Brian Apel, Jake Earl, Erik Maurer, Katherine Escanlar, as well as the law firms of Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. and Saiber, LLC (collectively, “Defense…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In Re Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re Prudential Insurance Company America Sales Practice Litigation Agent Actions, Michael P. Malakoff, Esquire, and Malakoff, Doyle & Finberg, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.