Legal Opinion

Cochran v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1976No. 38329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his second Rule 27.26 motion. He seeks to set aside his conviction and ten-year sentence for armed robbery.

Movant’s first two grounds concern denial of his right to a speedy trial and failure to produce a police report at his trial. Both points were raised and denied *711on his direct appeal. See State v. Cochran, 366 S.W.2d 360[1, 2] (Mo.1963). They cannot be reconsidered in this post-conviction proceeding. Sweazea v. State, 515 S.W.2d 499[1] (Mo.1974).

Movant’s last three grounds concern identification testimony, cross examination of witnesses and jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Sweazea v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. State v. CochranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Bufalo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API