Legal Opinion

Condino v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 7, 1947No. 17893Published

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

The libellant, a longshoreman, having sustained personal injuries while working aboard the SS Moses Brown, a vessel which was owned by the United States, seeks recovery on the ground that it was the negligence of the respondents which brought about the accident. The American South African Lines, Inc., named as one of the respondents, was the operating agent, but the libellant admits that the operating agent, under the authority of Caldarola v. Eckert, 67 S.Ct. 1569 is not liable.

The respondent-impleaded, a stevedoring company, was the libellant’s employer.

The accident…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caldarola v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Doll v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  3. The Baron InnerdaleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API