Legal Opinion

Broadbelt v. Loew

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a new trial and for leave to. amend answer after judgment absolute in favor of plaintiff, directed by the Appellate Division. Action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The defendant moves for a new trial and for leave to amend the answer, after judgment absolute against her, in favor of plaintiff directed by the Appellate Division, upon an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in defendant’s favor. The action is for specific performance of a contract made in February, 1895, by which the plaintiff agreed to transfer two houses in; One Hundred and Forty-ninth street and St. Bichólas avenue, to the defendant, and the defendant agreed to convey to the plaintiff a house in Fifty-second street. The defendant rejected title on the. ground that the bay windows of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. RentzNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Baily v. HornthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dean v. DeanNew York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API