Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cardin v. Outdoor East

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1996No. A95A2407Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Chief Judge

I agree that the court below must be reversed, but for a different reason. In addition to the matters referred to in the majority opinion, the court’s order states: “Partial payment in this case does not except the contract from the statute of frauds.” Although the lease itself had been incorporated in the unverified complaint as an alleged lease, partial payment concerns a factual contention not raised in the pleadings. When such extraneous matters are considered, a motion on the pleadings must be treated as one for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56. OCGA § 9-11-12 (c); Baker v. Wulf,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Samuelson v. Lord, Aeck & Sergeant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. American Car Rentals, Inc. v. Walden Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Hart v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Jones v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Baker v. WulfCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API