Legal Opinion

Mark v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1996No. 95-356PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Prisoner Kim Mark brought this postcon-viction proceeding to challenge discipline imposed on him for making false statements and for engaging in sexual misconduct. The matters for which he was disciplined came to light after Mark reported to prison officials that he had been raped by another inmate. Mark correctly claims he has a first amendment right to report a grievance to prison officials. He maintains the imposition of discipline here violated that right, and also challenges the discipline imposed under the circumstances here as contrary to public policy.

We readily agree…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Claude E. Woods v. Larry SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Muriel D. Black v. Michael P. Lane, Michael Neal, P.A. Severs, CaptainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Risdal v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Mark Lee Jackson v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
  3. Shawn P. Shelton v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  4. State of Iowa v. Kurt Allen KraaiCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2021
  5. State of Iowa v. Kurt Allen KraaiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API