Geisendorff v. Eagles
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.
— This was a suit by the appellant Sarah H. Geisendorffj against the appellees, to recover the possession of certain personal property, and damages for the unlawful detention thereof. In her complaint, the appellant alleged, in substance, that she was the owner and entitled to the possession of the ice contained in the three,ice-houses situated farthest north, built and owned by Jacob C. Geisendorff and situated on the banks of the reservoir at Rome City, Noble county, Indiana, which said ice, as she was informed and believed, was of the value of seven thousand dollars, and had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fort Wayne, Jackson & Saginaw R. R. v. HusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Rudolph v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Swales v. SouthardIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Conwell v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Byram v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. LinskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Geisendorff v. EaglesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Higgins v. SpahrIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- General Motors Truck Co. v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.