New York Life Insurance v. Marcin
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
The first above-entitled action is brought in equity to rescind a policy of insurance of which the defendant is a beneficiary on the ground that fraudulent representations caused the reinstatement of the policy.
The second above-entitled action is one at law brought for the purpose of securing the amount of such insurance.
Both of these actions are at issue and can be reached for trial at an early date, although it is quite likely that the action at law will be reached at least several weeks after the time that the action in equity can be reached for trial. The defendant in the first…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. MarzecNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Wolff v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Phoenix Mutual Line Insurance v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Phoenix Mutual Line Insurance v. ConwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962