Legal Opinion
People v. Perez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 1992Published
1Opinion of the Court
*691The defendant’s application for a waiver of the mandatory surcharges imposed by the court is premature since he is presently incarcerated (see, CPL 420.35, 420.10 [5]; People v Angelista, 176 AD2d 238; People v Arfman, 167 AD2d 344; People v West, 124 Misc 2d 622).
We find that the sentences imposed by the court were not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Lawrence, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. West, New York County Courts1984
- People v. AngelistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. ArfmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990