Legal Opinion

Worth v. Butler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

— This was an action of slander brought -by Fanny Butler against Andrew Worth. The declaration states that the plaintiff is' and always has been an unmarried woman; that she had never been-suspected of being.guilty of fornication; that the defendant, on, &c., at said county, contriving, &c., in a certain discourse, &c., falsely and maliciously spoke and published of and concerning the plaintiff, who is and always has been an unmarried woman, the false, malicious, and defamatory words following, viz.: u I (the defendant meaning) have heard that Miss Fanny Butler (the plaintiff meaning) has had…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stout v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1820

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hart v. CoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Woolley v. Plaindealer Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Kelly v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Roe v. ChitwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API