Legal Opinion
Yorkshire Associates v. Halpern
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBernard Newman, J.
This is an application by plaintiff (landlord) for an injunction pendente lite. Defendant (in reality, the City Rent Administrator) is charged by law to conduct the activities and to take the very action which plaintiff complains of (City Rent and Rehabilitation Law; Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y41-5.0, subd. h, par. [3]).
The controlling facts are simple:
Plaintiff is the owner of an apartment building, containing 35 housing accommodations. The Bronx District Rent and Rehabilitation Director received from the New York City Department of Buildings on June 6, 1962 a list of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Suppus v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- McGillicuddy v. MonaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- 504 West 145th Street Corp. v. StoryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1955
- Kellong Holding Corp. v. WilsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- Kellas Real Estate Corp. v. GluckmannNew York Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by1 opinion
- D'Esposito v. GabelNew York Supreme Court · 1963