Minter v. Clements
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
Error is assigned to the action of the trial court in submitting this tort action to the jury on the issue of damages alone. Counsel for the defendant (plaintiff in error) admits her primary negligence, but urges that the evidence raised a jury issue of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence. The sole question, then, is whether the court should have granted an instruction respecting the plaintiff’s contributory negligence, and should have permitted the jury to determine the issue.
Linda Gayle Clements brought this action, by her next friend, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bates v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Hopkins v. GromovskySupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Unger v. RackleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Hoffman v. StuartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Virginia Transit Company v. SchainSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Finch v. McRaeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
- Tomlin v. WorleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1965