Wilson v. Quick-Tire Service
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
It is necessary only to discuss the ruling stated in the second headnote. This ease in its facts is somewhat similar to that of Gillespie v. Mullally, 30 Ga. App. 118 (117 S. E. 98). The first *311headnote in that case is as follows: “The evidence being positive and uncontradicted that when the defendant’s automobile struck and injured the plaintiff it was being operated without the knowledge or consent of the defendant or of the proprietor of the garage in which the defendant had stored it, and that the person driving it was without authority, express or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. AmorousCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Reilly v. . ConnableNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Steffen v. McNaughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Hartnett v. GryzmishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Dougherty v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Sparks v. Buffalo Cab Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Brown v. BondMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
- Marketing Sales Industries of Georgia, Inc. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Brennan v. National NuGrape Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.